On January 6, the panel to recommend criminal charges against Bannon


“This is open contempt of an apparent baseless subpoena,” said Mr. Robbins, who teaches a course on Congressional Investigations at Brown University. He called the invocation of executive privilege “patently bogus”, adding: “It is hard to imagine that he will not be fired for prosecution.”

Once Congress votes to despise Mr. Bannon, the next step would be to refer the case to the US prosecutor in Washington. If the White House determines that no claims of executive privilege apply, the US attorney’s office would then decide to take the case to a grand jury, in consultation with senior Justice Department officials.

But if Mr Bannon sued, the Justice Department would most likely follow past practices and wait for the courts to resolve the case before bringing the contempt charge to a grand jury, Mr Shaub said.

In letters transmitting its subpoenas to Mr Bannon and the three former Trump administration officials, the committee said it was seeking information about the president’s actions before and during the riot.

Mr. Bannon reportedly contacted Mr. Trump on December 30 and urged him to focus his efforts on January 6, the committee said. He was also present at a meeting at the Willard Hotel in Washington the day before the violence, when plans were discussed to try to overturn the election results the next day, the committee said. Mr Bannon is said to have said: “All hell will break loose tomorrow. “

On Wednesday, the committee also issued a subpoena to Jeffrey Clark, a former Justice Department official who participated in Mr. Trump’s efforts to overturn the election. The committee’s action came the same day it heard lengthy closed-door testimony from Jeffrey A. Rosen, the former acting attorney general, who testified publicly and in private about the final days of the Trump administration. , when the former president urged senior officials to use the Justice Department to advance false allegations of electoral fraud.

In private testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Rosen said Mr. Clark told him that Mr. Trump was preparing to fire Mr. Rosen and endorse Mr. Clark’s strategy of continuing the abuses. conspiracy theories on voting booths and fraud. .

“Well, I can’t be fired by someone who works for me” Mr. Rosen said he spoke to Mr. Clark about it.

Source link

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.